ShockTillYouDrop.com

Posted by: Mr.Bateman on April 19, 2009 at 16:28:03

first!!!!!
and this news sucks by the way

Posted by: Steven Millan on April 19, 2009 at 16:36:15

That's quite a surprise to hear,for heck:even the original didn't get a sequel(and was slightly left open for one).

Posted by: bob2 on April 19, 2009 at 16:37:37

The original was scarier.

These remakes Hollywood is making aren't bad but their not "more better" than the original.

ex. Halloween, Friday 13th, Bloody Valentine, etc...

Posted by: ico on April 19, 2009 at 16:43:40

Damn. I kind of liked the first. It wasn't award winning or anything but it was fun to watch. I still haven't seen the original though.

Posted by: Methos on April 19, 2009 at 16:51:28

That is unusual, the studio's usually want to milk these films for every dime knowing that the teen crowds will pay up to see gore.

Posted by: The Chud on April 19, 2009 at 17:23:33

Of course Lionsgate doesn't want to do a sequel. It's not Saw, therefore, it's not a franchise. Just more evidence that Lionsgate is run by complete retards.

Posted by: Fridge on April 19, 2009 at 17:32:51

It's because of Saw that Lionsgate doesn't want to do a sequel. Saw is their franchise, it's what they get all their money from, they don't need another horror movie franchise. When in doubt, just make a Saw movie.

Posted by: MistAh BlistAh on April 19, 2009 at 18:19:28

Boooooooooooooooooo

Posted by: michaelmatz on April 19, 2009 at 19:50:24

Thank You Lionsgate

I found that the remake was kind of boring and i was hoping for a LOT more than what was provided

Posted by: Ron on April 19, 2009 at 20:05:37

I think Lionsgate is gonna learn the hard way with the whole Saw franchise thing. But whatever, this does sucks b/c I was looking forward to another MBV but I will get over it with the other upcoming 3D thrills.

Posted by: shane tea french on April 19, 2009 at 21:24:40

This frakking movie sucked balls but was interresting to watch because of the 3-D, "BOLT" was better and i didn't even see it!

Posted by: Our Time Has Come on April 19, 2009 at 21:25:32

personally I think thats great
I thought it was an excellent remake
and doesnt need a half aced sequel to ruin its credit
so I find this to be great news

Posted by: ico on April 19, 2009 at 22:55:43

shane tea french

The fact that you said "frakking" proves to me that i shouldn't take your opinion seriously.

Posted by: Movie_Jamie on April 19, 2009 at 23:27:05

Haven't seen this one but will here soon. I've heard positive reviews for the most part.

I've been through with the Saw movies since III. They won't get anymore of my money via their sequels...but clearly there are millions of fans who have continued to get milked.

Posted by: Jason21 on April 20, 2009 at 00:34:38

what? the movie was really good, a hard R film. saw is just worn out, there dragging the story and giving to much info on jigsaw, which is making it really less scary and more boring.

Posted by: Armani on April 20, 2009 at 01:27:28

Truthfully, I felt this movie was mediocre at best. The **** acting completely ruined it for me.

Posted by: Viktor on April 20, 2009 at 01:28:36

Thank Hera! That's the best news of the day

Posted by: francesco on April 20, 2009 at 03:06:03

**** Fox. i really would like to see a sequel!

Posted by: Calum on April 20, 2009 at 04:04:28

In latest news, film company Lionsgate have officially become a Hollywood player by making a stupid decision with not making a sequel to "My Bloody Valentine 3D". Congrats, you've officially joined the league of 20th Century Fox, WB, Universal, Paramount, Disney etc.

I loved the remake and love the original, the original has something about it that is purely fun and the remake was so stupid it was off the charts, I loved it so much. I wish there would be a sequel. A boy can dream. At least it's the other way around with Lussier having an idea and the studio not wanting to do it instead of the studio wanting to do it and the director not knowing what to do.

I'll still be getting the film on Blu-Ray when it comes out here in Australia. I loved it, it was SO corny and so cheesy, thusly made a delicious feast!

Posted by: francesco on April 20, 2009 at 04:56:22

i meant **** Lionsgate!

Posted by: Jimothy on April 20, 2009 at 10:52:41

Good! Use the $$ made off this one to develop something ORIGINAL for a change instead of remakes and sequels.

Posted by: Doctor_Splatz on April 20, 2009 at 18:21:32

Oh well...

Posted by: A sshole of A ssholes on April 20, 2009 at 19:27:30

This is great news! We won't have to deal with another c rapfest of a movie. Thank God

Posted by: A.J. Hakari on April 21, 2009 at 02:48:47

Lionsgate *doesn't* want to make another horror movie? Riiiiiight...

We'll see in five years, at which time two more "Valentine" movies will have been pumped direct-to-DVD.

Whatever you say, Lionsgate...

Posted by: Space Monkey on April 21, 2009 at 09:40:39

Since when do studios want to leave a movie as a one shot? They want sequels for everything to to get our money!!

This is one of those times when it wouldn't be bad to see a sequel. Hell, every other time you DON'T want a movie sequel to be made and leave it as a one shot, they do it anyway and ruin it, lol. Looks like they're doing things backwards!