Most Active

Eli Roth Not Involved with Hostel III
2 new posts | 16 total posts
Visit Harper's Island on DVD
2 new posts | 12 total posts
The Hotties of Halloween 2
2 new posts | 27 total posts
Two TV Spots for The Final Destination
2 new posts | 3 total posts
Cloverfield (Review #2)
1 new posts | 4 total posts
A Nightmare on Elm Street
1 new posts | 66 total posts
Art Spotted for Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash 2
1 new posts | 21 total posts
That's a Wrap on Nightmare on Elm Street
1 new posts | 18 total posts
Piranha 3D Photos to Make You Gag
1 new posts | 13 total posts

News

Eli Roth Not Involved with Hostel III
Source:Edward Douglas
July 8, 2009


ShockTillYouDrop.com's brother site ComingSoon.net spent some time earlier today talking to director Eli Roth about his dramatic acting role in Quentin Tarantino's WWII movie Inglourious Basterds. Anyone worried acting opposite Brad Pitt might convince Roth to switch careers shouldn't fret, because he has a lots of projects he's been developing both to direct himself as well as producing others.

That said, you won't be seeing him making any more "Hostel" movies, and he's no way involved with the plans to make a direct-to-DVD 3-quel to his best-known film. "That's another one like 'Cabin Fever 2,'" he told us. "The studio had made a lot of money with it so they want to keep going, and the fans, there's demand for it, and great. If I started something and other people want to continue it, go for it. I'm just not involved in anyway. There's no negativity about it. I just said, 'I put everything in my life for three years into these movies. I've said everything I have to say with it. I feel very lucky I got to make them and the fans responded the way they did, and if you guys want to continue it, great, go ahead.'"

"I think if it's a great movie, what's wrong with a great movie, whether it's #1, 2, 3, 4?" he mused when asked whether the reception to Hostel: Part II turned him off to sequels. "I remember I loved 'Friday the 13th Part IV. I didn't expect that movie to be that great. I remember loving 'Nightmare on Elm Street III', going 'Wow, I had no idea' and then of course now, it's like, 'Oh yeah, Frank Darabont and Chuck Russell, of course.' But I'm all for sequels, as long as it's a well-made movie, I don't care if it's a sequel, a prequel, a remake or an original film. If it's well-made film and it's entertaining and I got my money's worth, then I love it, I'm all for it."

Roth isn't enough of a fan of remakes to direct the remake of Tobe Hooper's Funhouse he's been developing for Universal. "It's a film that I enjoy that I think it would be fantastic to remake and do it really really gory with a huge body count, but there's no films that I'm interested in personally remaking. I have too many original stories that I want to do. I'm not saying I wouldn't but there's no remake that has trumped any of those other ideas."

We also asked Roth whether the movie based on Stephen King's Cell was still happening, since we hadn't heard much about it since Roth was doing press for Hostel: Part II two years ago. "I walked off 'Cell' kind of quietly," he admitted. "There was just sort of a difference in opinion on how to make to film and what the story should be, and there's a different direction the studio wants to go with it. It was very friendly because it's the Weinsteins, they made 'Inglourious Basterds' and we're all friends. I said, 'I'm not really interested in doing the film this way. You guys go ahead and I'm going to make my own films.' I've also learned that I really am only interested in directing original stories that I write, that's another thing I learned through that whole process."

He wouldn't say much about the $60 million sci-fi epic Endangered Species that will be his next movie, including whether a studio might get involved in the financing of his biggest budget movie to date--"all his deals are under wraps"--but he's looking to start casting to shoot in the Fall, depending on the locations and weather, which might push the start back to next spring.

In the meantime, Roth is producing a kung fu movie with rapper RZA of the Wu-Tang Clan directing, called The Man with the Iron Fist; they'll continue working on the script once RZA gets back from tour so they can start that. Also, he's co-producing the Daniell Stamm exorcism movie Cotton with partner Eric Newman for their company Arcade, which is currently in post-production, so maybe we'll see that at one of next year's festivals.

Look for our full interview with Roth over on ComingSoon.net something in the next few weeks before the release of Inglourious Basterdson August 21, 2009.


| 16 comments | Add a comment

  Related Articles

  Related From Other Sites

Comments

Posted by: WELL DRESSED MAN on July 8, 2009 at 22:31:11

What about Thanksgiving?


Posted by: FrightFilmFan on July 8, 2009 at 22:37:52

...funny thing; there's STILL no mention of the film project, which Eli Roth proposed, called "Trailer Trash", which was supposed to be chuck full of faux movie trailers (...by Eli, and several other film directors), produced in the same vein of those produced for "Grindhouse"; this was supposed to have materialized almost a year ago, yet seems to have been all but forgotten. What gives???


Posted by: djblack1313 on July 8, 2009 at 23:35:26

i'm not bashing Roth (i think his directing is getting better and better with each movie) but MAKE SOMETHING for christ's sake!! i'm sick to death of hearing about how Roth is "doing" this movie & that movie & this movie & that movie. he's supposedly making like 20 films and NONE of them are in production (that i know of. feel free to correct me if i'm wrong). there's THANKSGIVING, the untitled CLOVERFIELD-like monster movie, there's THE FUNHOUSE, there's TRAILER TRASH, there WAS "CELL", etc, etc, etc. make a freaking movie and STOP alerting us (not you SHOCK i'm referring to ELI) to what movies you WANT to do and start alerting to what movies you ACTUALLY ARE CURRENTLY, IN PRODUCTION doing.


Posted by: Rhino on July 9, 2009 at 00:00:42

OVER RATED....was never big fan of either Hostels... new funhouse would be cool but he needs to step his game up... in perfect world he would try high profile project like Halloween 2


Posted by: Jack on July 9, 2009 at 00:29:49

Too bad Halloween 2 will suck hard.


Posted by: ico on July 9, 2009 at 00:50:59

I think Hostel 3 should be about the owners of the American branch, starting it up and so forth (because it is taking place in the U.S.). Since the first was about the victims and the second was about the customers, it kind of makes sense.


Posted by: Matthew H. on July 9, 2009 at 01:10:43

"Cell" is saved!!!! Thank you Lord! Why on Earth did he want to turn "Cell" into a gorefest, anyway? It literally made no contextual sense. Hopefully now they will stick to the actual story of the book, which is very character/story driven with strong family ties and such. From what I've seen and heard of Roth's performance in "Basterd's," it is going to be great. I just don't think the man has an ounce of talent as a horror director. He is under the misconception that gore/ridiculous-torture-sequences = scary. True horror is when things get into your mind and stay with you for a long, long time. Not watching someone lose an eye.


Posted by: General Gokemidoro on July 9, 2009 at 09:32:55

Cabin Fever is his best in my eye. The Hostel's could have been so much better if they would have been done without the teenage T&A approach.

If Roth could/would just take a break from loving himself he might get something done. But I really don't care. I would Thanksgiving though.


Posted by: brain on July 9, 2009 at 11:43:47

I think he's three-for-three with directing. I also loved his Thanksgiving trailer and I think people are going to be blown away when they see the short film he shot for Inglourious Basterds entitled "Nation's Pride".


Posted by: ShadowMan on July 9, 2009 at 17:08:28

"I walked off 'Cell' kind of quietly," he admitted. "There was just sort of a difference in opinion on how to make to film and what the story should be, and there's a different direction the studio wants to go with it."

Yes, they wanted it to actually be good, and quickly realised that wasn't going to happen with talent-vacuum Roth at the helm. Besides, walked away quietly always plays better than fired for his ideas and vision of the film being absolutely crap. Hopefully Cell will land in the hands of a director who actually understands horror beyond just splattering fake gore all over the place.


(on Funhouse)"It's a film that I enjoy that I think it would be fantastic to remake and do it really really gory with a huge body count, but there's no films that I'm interested in personally remaking."

So in other words Roth is happy to take someone elses work, completely bastardise it, and make a quick profit on it, just so long as he doesn't have to make any actual effort himself to do so. Classy. No wonder he's doing so well in the pit of mediocrity and blind greed that is Hollywood.


Posted by: GoreGore_Dancer on July 9, 2009 at 20:45:23

I love that man!


Posted by: Nunya on July 10, 2009 at 05:58:48

So in other words Roth is happy to take someone elses work, completely bastardise it, and make a quick profit on it, just so long as he doesn't have to make any actual effort himself to do so. Classy. No wonder he's doing so well in the pit of mediocrity and blind greed that is Hollywood.

You're an idiot. Actually - he said the total opposite of that, moron. You can comprehend things, right? Or you just misinterpreting things just so you can insult somebody?

"Cell" is saved!!!! Thank you Lord! Why on Earth did he want to turn "Cell" into a gorefest, anyway?

I read the book and as far as I could tell - the things that happened, if they happened in real life would be pretty gory. Did you read the book? Did you miss the first few pages? Because that alone was pretty gory. Man, another moron. Why can't we have both? A gory movie and whatever you said? Plus - gore fest is two separate words.


Posted by: ShadowMan on July 10, 2009 at 10:57:20

No obviously you're the idiot if you can't comprehend the idea that taking someone elses original work, having the revolutionary 'idea' to change it for no other reason than to add pointless gore and try and resell it again with minimum effort or originality, but instead just cashing in on the name of the film that another film maker created, and the reputation it has with cult horror fans, and then giving it to someone else to actually do that so-called 'updating' while you sit back and rake in the cash is anything but lazy, disrespectful and greedy, and the absolute lowest common denominator of all that can be worst about the hollywood remake machine. Eli Roth isn't a horror fan, he's an Eli Roth fan. You can't be a real horror fan and still know as little about what actually makes for great horror as he clearly does.

As for Cell, yes, I did read the book, and unlike you and Eli, I actually got past the surface level interpretation for the truly short sighted and unimaginative. The book, just like all good horror, was about building an atmosphere and sense of dread, something Roth knows absolutely nothing about. Great horror is in the build up, in the atmosphere and the fear of what is around the next corner, it's in building characters and following them on their journey and caring enough about them that you fear for them on their behalf. It's not in splashing gore around as much as possible and showing lashings of fake ultra-violence and then calling it a day. And that's something that Roth clearly just doesn't get. Gore as the point doesn't work, and it's not just unscary, it's boring and repetitive. You know, just like Roth's films have all been.

But hey, I'm arguing with someone whose biggest comeback is "gore fest is two seperate words", so clearly I'm talking to someone who can't see the forest for the trees. Is that you, Eli?


Posted by: Ark-Angel on July 10, 2009 at 12:53:42

Ok, I'm not the biggest fan of this guy.. but I did like Hostel... cabin fever... not so much.

"The book, just like all good horror, was about building an atmosphere and sense of dread, something Roth knows absolutely nothing about."

Ummm I find this statement to be false. I thought Hostel had a lot of buildup once you get past the first "porn" part of the film. I think the story and the way it was filmed does quite well at building up to something dreadful. I havn't ever seen the second one yet, but I did enjoy the first one.


Posted by: ShadowMan on July 11, 2009 at 07:05:58

I don't find Roth's films to have any atmosphere at all, beyond predictable 'mood lighting' and an a-b-c- approach to "if he catches you he'll cut you - oooh he's got you - ooooh now he's cut you, look at all the gore!". Gruesome and scary aint nearly the same things, not in my book. Gore should be a tool of horror, just another color to paint with, something used to make a point, not be the whole point, as Roth's films tend to so boringly be.

I have nothing against gore or gory films, quite the opposite in fact, but gore for gore's sake is boring as hell. And that's what Roth's films always strike me as. The horror movie equivalent of a lowest common denominator gross out comedy, and about as relevant and memorable. In other words, not very. At all.

That said, hey, if you enjoy the guys films or if they work for you then more power to ya. I'm not about to tell anyone that they shouldn't like any film that they like just because I don't happen to like them myself. If you enjoy something then it shouldn't matter who else agrees with you or not. All taste is personal and subjective. Me, I don't like his work, at all, so I state my opinion on that and say exactly why I feel that way. But it's still just my own personal opinion and never meant as anything but that.

It's just that personally I find him to be all that's wrong with modern horror, for all the reasons that I have outlined previously, and more besides. Plus his frat boy personality and ego and tendency of talking himself up just makes him incredibly annoying on top of that, especially for someone who, I think, has made no contribution of note or quality to the genre. He just strikes me as the used car salesman of horror, but hey, like I said, that's just me.


Posted by: Lord Butt Trumpet on July 11, 2009 at 10:22:04

Aw yes. The pointless bickering just makes me laugh. No Roth on Hostel 3 is great news. Maybe we will get a good horror movie this time.

But then again do we really need another one? I don't. Toot, toot!


« Previous Page

|

Page 1 of 1

|

Total: 16 comments

|

Next Page »

Jump to page: 1

Add a comment

Name:   

 

E-mail:   

 

Comments:   

 

Security Code:   

 

 
 

 Remember my name/e-mail address

 

SHOCKTILLYOUDROP.COM SECTIONS: MAIN | CONTACT US | NEWS | FEATURES | REVIEWS | BOARDS | ADVERTISE | PRIVACY STATEMENT | TERMS OF USE

HOSTED BY NEXCESS

ShockTillYouDrop.com, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline, LLC © 2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

MORE IN THE CRAVE FILM CHANNEL: ONLINE VIDEOS AND CRAZY VIDEOS AT CRAVEONLINE | COMINGSOON.NET | SUPERHERO HYPE! | DVDFILE